Triboelectrostatic separation has been used for the commercial beneficiation of coal combustion fly ash to produce a low carbon product for use as a cement replacement in concrete for nearly twenty years…. STET’s patented electrostatic separator has been used to produce over 15 Million tonnes of low carbon product…Recent environmental legislation…coupled with a requirement …to empty historical landfill sites, has created the need to develop a process to beneficiate historically landfilled ash…
Pakua PDFTriboelectrostatic Beneficiation of
Land Filled Fly Ash
L. Mwokaji, A. Gupta, na S. Gasiorowski
Vifaa vya ST & Teknolojia LLC, 101 Avenue ya Hampton, Haja ham MA 02494 USA
CONFERENCE: 2015 World of Coal Ash – (www.worldofcoalash.org)
MANENO: Wilaya ya Ki-electrotuli, Majadiliano ya manufaa, Kuruka majivu, Landfilled, Dried, Kujitenga, Carbon
ABSTRACT
Triboelectrostatic separation has been used for the commercial beneficiation of coal combustion fly ash to produce a low carbon product for use as a cement replacement in concrete for nearly twenty years. With 18 separators in 12 coal-fired power plants across the world, Vifaa vya ST & Teknolojia ya LLC (STET) patented electrostatic separator has been used to produce over 15 Million tonnes of low carbon product.
To date, commercial beneficiation of fly ash has been performed exclusively on dry “run of station‿ ash. Recent environmental legislation has created, in certain markets, a need to supply beneficiated ash in times of low ash generation. This, coupled with a requirement in some locations to empty historical ash landfill sites, has created the need to develop a process to beneficiate historically landfilled ash.
Previous studies have shown that the exposure of fly ash to moisture, and subsequent drying influences the triboelectrostatic charging mechanism, with carbon and mineral particles charging in the opposite polarity to that experienced with run of station ash. Studies have been performed by the authors to determine the effect of moisture exposure on separation efficiency of several ashes that have been reclaimed from landfills and dried. Charge reversal was experienced following drying, but overall separation efficiency was achieved equivalent to that experienced with fresh run of station ash.
The effect of dried ash feed relative humidity on triboelectrostatic separation efficiency was examined, and sensitivity was greatly reduced compared to that experienced with run of station ash, lowering overall process costs.
UTANGULIZI
Marekani ya makaa ya mawe Ash chama (ACAA) utafiti wa mwaka wa uzalishaji na matumizi ya makaa ya mawe kuruka majivu taarifa kuwa kati ya 1966 na 2011, juu ya 2.3 billion short tons of fly ash have been produced by coal-fired utility boilers.1 Of this amount approximately 625 tani milioni zimetumika manufaa, zaidi kwa ajili ya uzalishaji wa saruji na saruji. Hata hivyo, iliyobaki 1.7+ billion tons are primarily found in landfills or filled ponded
impoundments. While utilization rates for freshly generated fly ash have increased considerably over recent years, with current rates near 45%, takriban 40 million tons of fly ash continue to be disposed of annually. While utilization rates in Europe have been much higher than in the US, considerable volumes of fly ash have also been stored in landfills and impoundments in some European countries.
Hivi karibuni, interest in recovering this disposed material has increased, partially due to the demand for high-quality fly ash for concrete and cement production during a period of reduced production as coal-fired power generation has decreased in Europe and North America. Concerns about the long-term environmental impact of such landfills are also prompting utilities to find beneficial use applications for this stored ash.
LAND FILLED ASH QUALITY AND REQUIRED BENEFICIATION
While some of this stored fly ash may be suitable for beneficial use as initially excavated, the vast majority will require some processing to meet quality standards for cement or concrete production. Since the material has been typically wetted to enable handling and compaction while avoiding airborne dust generation, drying will probably be a minimal requirement for use in concrete since concrete producers will want to continue the practice of batching fly ash as a dry powder. Hata hivyo, assuring the chemical composition of the ash meets specifications, most notably the carbon content measured as loss-on-ignition (WA), is a greater challenge. As fly ash utilization has increased in the last 20+ miaka, most “in-spec‿ ash has been beneficially used, and the off-quality ash disposed. Thus, LOI reduction will be a requirement for utilizing the vast majority of fly ash recoverable from utility impoundments.
LOI REDUCTION BY TRIBOELECTRIC SEPARATION
While various workers have used combustion techniques and flotation processes for LOI reduction of recovered landfilled and ponded fly ash, Vifaa vya ST & Technologies (STET) has found that its standard processing system, long used for beneficiation of freshly generated fly ash, is equally effective on recovered ash after suitable drying and deagglomeration at lower overall operating costs.
During the ramp-up to commercial application of the STET processing system for fly ash, STET researchers tested the separation of dried landfilled ash. This recovered ash separated very similarly to freshly generated ash with one surprising difference: the particle charging was reversed from that of fresh ash with the carbon charging negative in relation to the mineral.2 Other researchers of electrostatic separation of fly ash carbon have also observed this phenomena.3,4,5
TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW – FLY ASH CARBON SEPARATION
In the STET carbon separator (Kielelezo 1), material is fed into the thin gap between two parallel planar electrodes. Chembe ni za kiumeme zinazoshtakiwa na mawasiliano ya mchanganyiko. The positively charged carbon and the negatively charged mineral (in freshly generated ash that has not been wetted and dried) ni kuvutia kwa electrodes kinyume. The particles are then swept up by a continuous moving belt and conveyed in opposite directions. Ukanda husonga chembe karibu na kila uchaguzi wakipanda kuelekea mwisho wa mgawanyiko. Kasi ya ukanda wa juu pia inawezesha njia za juu sana, hadi 36 tani kwa saa kwenye kitenganishi kimoja. Mwanya mdogo, high voltage field, kabiliana na mtiririko wa sasa, vigorous particle-particle agitation and self-cleaning action of the belt on the electrodes are the critical features of the STET separator. Kwa kudhibiti vigezo mbalimbali vya mchakato, kama vile kasi ya ukanda, kulisha pointi, and feed rate, the STET process produces low LOI fly ash at carbon contents of less than 1.5 kwa 4.5% from feed fly ashes ranging in LOI from 4% zaidi kwa 25%.
Mtini. 1 STET Separator
The separator design is relatively simple and compact. Mashine iliyoundwa kwa mchakato 36 tani kwa saa ni takriban 9 m (30 futi.) muda mrefu, 1.5 m (5 futi.) pana, na 2.75 m (9 futi.) juu. Ukanda na rollers kuhusishwa ni sehemu tu ya kusonga. Ya electrodes ni stationary na linajumuisha ya vifaa na muda mrefu ipasavyo. The belt is made of non- conductive plastic. The separator’s power consumption is about 1 kilowati kwa tani moja ya vifaa vya kusindika na wengi wa nguvu zinazotumiwa na motors mbili kuendesha ukanda wa.
Mchakato ni kavu kabisa, requires no additional materials other than the fly ash and produces no waste water or air emissions. The recovered materials consist of fly ash reduced in carbon content to levels suitable for use as a pozzolanic admixture in
concrete, and a high carbon fraction useful as fuel. Matumizi ya mito yote miwili ya bidhaa hutoa 100% ufumbuzi wa matatizo ya utupaji wa majivu.
RECOVERED FUEL VALUE OF HIGH-CARBON FLY ASH
In addition to the low carbon product for use in concrete, brand named ProAsh®, the STET separation process also recovers otherwise wasted unburned carbon in the form of carbon-rich fly ash, branded EcoTherm™. EcoTherm™ has significant fuel value and can easily be returned to the electric power plant using the STET EcoTherm™ Return system to reduce the coal use at the plant. When EcoTherm™ is burned in the utility boiler, the energy from combustion is converted to high pressure / high temperature steam and then to electricity at the same efficiency as coal, typically 35%. The conversion of the recovered thermal energy to electricity in ST Equipment & Technology LLC EcoTherm™ Return system is two to three times higher than that of the competitive technology where the energy is recovered as low-grade heat in the form of hot water which is circulated to the boiler feed water system. EcoTherm™ is also used as a source of alumina in cement kilns, displacing the more expensive bauxite which is usually transported long distances. Utilizing the high carbon EcoTherm™ ash either at a power plant or a cement kiln, maximizes the energy recovery from the delivered coal, reducing the need to mine and transport additional fuel to the facilities.
STET’s Raven Power Brandon Shores, SMEPA R.D. Kesho, NBP Belledune, RWEnpower Didcot, EDF Energy West Burton, and RWEnpower Aberthaw fly ash plants, all include EcoTherm™ Return systems. The essential components of the system are presented in Figure 2.
Mtini. 2 EcoTherm™ Return system
STET ASH PROCESING FACILITIES
Controlled low LOI fly ash is produced with STET’s technology at twelve power stations throughout the U.S., Kanada, the U.K., Polandi, and Republic of Korea. ProAsh® fly ash has been approved for use by over twenty state highway authorities, as well as many other specification agencies. ProAsh® has also been certified under Canadian Standards Association and EN 450:2005 viwango vya ubora katika Ulaya. Ash processing facilities using STET technology are listed in Table 1.
Jedwali 1. STET Commercial Operations
Matumizi / Power Station |
Mahali |
Start of Commercial operations |
Facility Details |
Progress Energy – Roxboro Station |
Kaskazini mwa Carolina |
Sept. 1997 |
2 Vitenganishi |
Nguvu ya Raven – Brandon Shores Station |
Maryland USA |
Aprili 1999 |
2 Vitenganishi 35,000 ton storage dome. Ecotherm™ Return 2008 |
ScotAsh (Lafarge / Scottish Power Joint Venture) – Longannet Station |
Scotland |
Oktoba. 2002 |
1 Kitenganishi |
Jacksonville Electric Authority – St. John’s River Power Park,FL |
Florida |
Mei 2003 |
2 Separators Coal/Petcoke blends Ammonia Removal |
South Mississippi Electric Power Authority R.D. Morrow Station |
Mississippi USA |
Jan. 2005 |
1 Separator Ecotherm™ Return |
New Brunswick Power Company Belledune Station |
New Brunswick, Kanada |
Aprili 2005 |
1 Separator Coal/Petcoke Blends Ecotherm™ Return |
RWE npower Didcot Station |
Uingereza |
Agosti 2005 |
1 Separator Ecotherm™ Return |
PPL Brunner Island Station |
Pennsylvania Marekani |
Desemba 2006 |
2 Vitenganishi 40,000 Ton storage dome |
Tampa Electric Co. Big Bend Station |
Florida |
Aprili 2008 |
3 Vitenganishi, kupita mara mbili 25,000 Ton storage dome Ammonia Removal |
RWE npower Aberthaw Station (Lafarge Cement UK) |
Wales Uingereza |
Septemba 2008 |
1 Separator Ammonia Removal Ecotherm™ Return |
EDF Energy West Burton Station (Lafarge Cement UK, Cemex) |
Uingereza |
Oktoba 2008 |
1 Separator Ecotherm™ Return |
ZGP (Saruji ya Lafarge Poland / Ciech Janikosoda JV) |
Polandi |
Machi 2010 |
1 Kitenganishi |
Korea South-East Power Yeongheung Units 5&6 |
Korea Kusini |
Septemba 2014 |
1 Separator Ecotherm™ Return |
COAL ASH RECOVERED FROM LAND FILLS
Two sources of ash were obtained from landfills: sample A from a power plant located in
the United Kingdom and sample B: from the United States. Both these samples consisted of ash from the combustion of bituminous coal by large utility boilers. Due to the intermingling of material in the landfills, no further information is available concerning specific coal source or combustion conditions.
The samples as received by STET contained between 15% na 20% water as is typical for landfilled material. The samples also contained varying amounts of large >1/8 inchi (~3 mm) material. To prepare the samples for carbon separation, the large debris was removed by screening and the samples then dried and deagglomerated prior to carbon beneficiation. Various methods for drying/deagglomeration are being evaluated in order to optimize the overall process. A general process flow sheet is presented in Figure 3.
Kielelezo 3: Process flow sheet
The properties of the prepared samples were well within the range of fly ash obtained directly from normal utility boilers. The most relevant properties for both the separator feeds and products are summarized in Table 2 along with recovered product.
CARBON SEPARATION
Carbon reduction trials using the STET triboelectric belt separator resulted in very good recovery of low LOI product. The interesting phenomena observed was the reversal of charging of the carbon discussed above. While this behavior has been observed previously by STET and other researchers, the mechanism that changes the relative work functions and thus contact charging behavior of the material is not understood. One suggested mechanism is the redistribution of soluble ions on the mineral and
carbon particles, possibly further influenced by the pH of the aqueous solution on the ash4. Whatever the fundamental mechanism is, it does not appear to degrade the practical application of triboelectric separation to reduce the carbon content of the ash.
The properties of the low LOI fly ash recovered using the STET process for both freshly collected ash from the boiler and ash recovered from the landfill is summarized in Table
2.The results show that the STET process efficiency for the recovered landfill ash is within the range expected for ash freshly collected from the utility boiler.
Jedwali 2: Properties of feed and recovered low-LOI ash.
Feed Sample to Separator |
WA |
ProAsh LOI® |
ProAsh Fineness, %® +45 µm |
ProAsh® Mass Yield |
EcoTherm® High Carbon Product |
Fresh A |
10.2 % |
3.6 % |
23 % |
84 % |
39 % |
Landfill A |
9.8 % |
3.3 % |
20 % |
75 % |
28 % |
Fresh B |
5.3 % |
2.8 % |
17 % |
91 % |
28 % |
Landfill B |
6.9 % |
4.5 % |
24 % |
86 % |
26 % |
PROCESS ECONOMICS
Pamoja na gharama za kawaida ya mchakato STET, gharama ya kukausha na zinalipwa, ash maudhui high unyevu kuongezeka gharama ya uendeshaji wa jumla wa mchakato wa. Jedwali 3 Muhtasari wa gharama za mafuta kwa ajili ya operesheni zote katika Marekani na Uingereza kwa ajili ya 15% na 20% yaliyomo ya unyevu. Kutokuweko kawaida ya kukausha ni pamoja na katika thamani mahesabu. Gharama ni kuzingatia wingi wa vifaa baada ya kukausha.
Jedwali 3: Kukausha gharama misingi ya Misa kavu.
Unyevu | Joto mahitaji KWhr/t | Kukausha gharama / T kavu msingi UK | Kukausha gharama / T kavu msingi U.S. |
---|---|---|---|
Gharama ya gesi 0.027 £/ kWhr | Gharama ya gesi $4.75 / mmBtu | ||
15 % | 165 | £ 5.24 | £ 1.94 |
£ 8.48 | £ 3.14 | ||
£ 6.73 | £ 2.49 | ||
20 % | 217 | £ 7.23 | £ 2.71 |
£ 11.85 | £ 4.39 | ||
£ 9.40 | £ 3.48 |
ASH CHEMISTRY AND PERFORMANCE IN CONCRETE
The properties of the low carbon ash generated from the dried landfill material were compared to that of freshly obtained ash to check the suitability for use in concrete production. Dodoma
following table summarizes the chemistry for samples from source B. Testing on source A material has not been completed.
Jedwali 4: Ash Chemistry of low LOI ash.
Source B material |
SiO2 |
Al2O3 |
Fe2O3 |
CaO |
MgO |
K2O |
Na2O |
SO3 |
Fresh Production |
51.60 |
24.70 |
9.9 |
2.22 |
0.85 |
2.19 |
0.28 |
0.09 |
Landfilled |
50.40 |
25.00 |
9.3 |
3.04 |
0.85 |
2.41 |
0.21 |
0.11 |
Strength development of a 20% substitution of the low LOI fly ash in a mortar containing 600 lb / yd3 showed the material derived from landfilled ash performed somewhat better than material from fresh production. Tazama Jedwali 5 below.
Jedwali 5: Compressive strength of mortar cubes.
|
7 day Compressive Strength PSI |
28 day Compressive Strength PSI |
Fresh |
3948 |
5185 |
Landfilled |
4254 |
5855 |
CONCLUSIONS
After suitable scalping of large material, drying, and deagglomeration, fly ash recovered from utility plant landfills can be reduced in carbon content using the commercialized STET triboelectric belt separator. The efficiency of the STET system is essentially equivalent for ashes obtained freshly from boiler operations and dried landfilled material. The separator product is suitable for use in concrete production without further beneficiation with nearly identical performance properties. The recovery and beneficiation of landfilled ash will provide a continuing supply of high quality ash for concrete producers in spite of the reduced production of “fresh‿ ash as coal-fired utilities reduce generation. Hayo, power plants that need to remove ash from landfills to meet changing environmental regulations will be able to utilize the process to alter a waste product liability into a valuable raw material for concrete producers.
MAREJEO
[1]American Coal Ash Coal Combustion products and Use Statistics: https://www.acaa-usa.org/Publications/Production-Use-Reports/
[2]ST internal report, Agosti 1995.
[3]Li,T.X,. Schaefer, J.L., Ban, H., Neathery, J.K., and Stencel, J.M. Dry Beneficiation Processing of Combustion Fly Ash, Kesi ya DOE UNCTAD na kaboni Unburned kwenye shirika kuruka jivu, Mei 19 20, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
[4]Baltrus, J.P., Diehl, J.R., Soong, Y., Changarawe, W. Triboelectrostatic mgawanyo wa kuruka majivu na ubatilishaji wa malipo, Mafuta 81, (2002) pp.757-762.
[5]Cangialosi, F., Notarnicola, M., Liberti, L, Stencel, J. Jukumu la weathering juu ya usambazaji wa malipo ya kuruka majivu wakati triboelectrostatic beneficiation, Shajara ya vifaa hatari, 164 (2009) pp.683-688.
Neno na PDF Converter Kuongoka kwa BCLTechnologies