Selectaţi limba:
American cărbune cenuşă Asociaţiei (ACAA) anchetă anuală de producție și utilizarea cărbunelui cenuși zburătoare rapoarte că între 1966 şi 2011, peste 2.3 miliarde tone de cenuși zburătoare au fost produse de utilitate cărbune cazane. Din aceasta suma, aproximativ 625 milioane de tone au fost utilizate efectiv, cea mai mare parte pentru producţia de ciment si beton. Cu toate acestea, rămase 1.7+ miliarde tone în primul rând sunt găsite în depozitele de deşeuri sau umplute ponded impoundments.
Triboelectrostatic Beneficiation din depozitul şi Ponded cenuși zburătoare
By Lewis Baker,Andrei crina, Florin Gasiorschi, and Frank Hrach
American cărbune cenuşă Asociaţiei (ACAA) anchetă anuală de producție și utilizarea cărbunelui cenuși zburătoare rapoarte că între 1966 şi 2011, peste 2.3 billion short tons of fly ash were produced by coal-fired utility boilers.1 Of this amount, aproximativ 625 milioane de tone au fost utilizate efectiv, cea mai mare parte pentru producţia de ciment si beton. Cu toate acestea, rămase 1.7+ miliarde tone în primul rând sunt găsite în depozitele de deşeuri sau umplute ponded impoundments. While use rates for freshly generated fly ash have increased considerably over recent years, cu rate curente aproape 45%, aproximativ 40 million tons of fly ash continue to be disposed of annually. While use rates in Europe have been much higher than in the United States, de asemenea, au fost depozitate volume considerabile de cenușă zburătoare în depozitele de deșeuri și în sechestrele din unele țări europene
Recent, interest in recovering this disposed material has increased, partially due to the demand for high-quality fly ash for concrete and cement production during a period of reduced production as coal-fired power generation has decreased in Europe and North America. Concerns about the long-term environmental impact of such landfills are also prompting utilities to find beneficial use applications for this stored ash.
While some of this stored fly ash may be suitable for beneficial use as initially excavated, the vast majority will require some processing to meet quality standards for cement or concrete production. Because the material has been typically wetted to enable handling and compaction while avoiding airborne dust generation, drying and deagglomeration is a necessary requirement for use in concrete because concrete producers will want to continue the practice of batching fly ash as a dry, fine powder. Cu toate acestea, assuring the chemical composition of the ash meets specifications—most notably the carbon content, measured as loss on ignition (LOI)—is a greater challenge. As fly ash use has increased in the last 20+ ani, most “in-spec” ash has been beneficially used, and the off-quality ash disposed. Thus, LOI reduction will be a requirement for using the vast majority of fly ash recoverable from utility impoundments.
While other researchers have used combustion techniques and flotation processes for LOI reduction of recovered landfilled and ponded fly ash, Echipament de ST & Technologies (STET) has found that its unique triboelectrostatic belt separation system, long used for beneficiation of freshly generated fly ash, is also effective on recovered ash after suitable drying and deagglomeration.
STET researchers have tested the triboelectrostatic separation behavior of dried landfilled ash from several fly ash landfills in the Americas and Europe. This recovered ash separated very similarly to freshly generated ash with one surprising difference: the particle charging was reversed from that of fresh ash, with the carbon charging negative in relation to the mineral.2 Other researchers of electrostatic separation of fly ash carbon have also observed this phenomenon.3-5 The polarity of the STET triboelectrostatic separator can easily be adjusted to allow rejection of negatively charged carbon from dried landfilled fly ash sources. No special modifications to the separator design or controls are necessary to accommodate his phenomena
În separatorul de carbon STET (Fig. 1), materialul este alimentat în decalajul subţire între doi electrozi plane paralele. Particulele sunt practicate triboelectrically de interparticle contact. Carbonul încărcat pozitiv și mineralul încărcat negativ (în cenușă proaspăt generată care nu a fost udată și uscată) sunt atrase de electrozi opusi. Particulele sunt apoi măturat printr-o centură în mişcare continuă şi transmisă în directii opuse. Centura se mută particule adiacent la fiecare electrod spre capetele opuse ale separatorul. The high belt speed also enables very high throughputs up to 36 tone pe oră pe un singur separator. Spațiu liber mic, high-voltage field, counter—current flow, vigorous particle-particle agitation, and self-cleaning action of the belt on the electrodes are the critical features of the STET separator. Prin controlul diverse parametrii de proces, cum ar fi viteza curelei, feed punct, şi hrana pentru animale rata, procesul de STET produce mici LOI cenuși zburătoare la conţinutul de carbon mai mică 1.5 pentru a 4.5% la feed zbura cenuşă variind în LOI din 4% la peste 25%.
Separatorul de proiectare este relativ simplu şi compact. O maşină concepute pentru a prelucra 40 tone pe oră este de aproximativ 30 Ft (9 m) lung, 5 Ft (1.5 m) largă, şi 9 Ft (2.75 m) Înalt. Curea si role asociate sunt doar piesele mobile. Electrozii sunt staționari și compus dintr-un material durabil în mod corespunzător. Centura este fabricată din plastic neconductiv. Consumul de energie al separatorului este de aproximativ 1 kilowatt-oră pe tonă de material prelucrat cu cea mai mare parte a puterii consumate de două motoare de conducere centura.
Procesul este complet uscat, requires no additional materials other than the fly ash, and produces no waste water or air emissions. Materialele recuperate constau din cenuși zburătoare redusă în conţinutul de carbon la niveluri adecvate pentru utilizare ca un adaos pozzolanic în beton, and a high-carbon fraction useful as fuel. Use of both product streams provides a 100% soluţie pentru problemele de eliminare cenuși zburătoare.
Four sources of ash were obtained from landfills: Sample A from a power plant located in the United Kingdom and Samples B, C, and D from the United States. All these samples consisted of ash from the combustion of bituminous coal by large utility boilers. Due to the intermingling of material in the landfills, no further information is available concerning specific coal source or combustion conditions.
The samples as received by STET contained between 15 şi 27% Apă, as is typical for landfilled material. The samples also contained varying amounts of large >1/8 în. (3 mm) material. To prepare the samples for carbon separation, the large debris was removed by screening and the samples then dried and deagglomerated prior to carbon beneficiation. Several methods for drying/deagglomeration have been evaluated at the pilot scale to optimize the overall process. STET has selected an industrially proven feed processing system that offers simultaneous drying and deagglomeration necessary for effective electrostatic separation. A general process flowchart is presented in Fig. 2.
The properties of the prepared samples were well within the range of cenuși zburătoare obtained directly from normal utility boilers. The most relevant properties for both the separator feeds and products are summarized in Table 2, along with recovered product.
STET separator processing dried, landfilled fly ash
Process flow diagram
Carbon reduction trials using the STET triboelectric belt separator resulted in very good recovery of low-LOI products from all four landfill fly ash sources. The reverse charging of the carbon as discussed previously did not degrade the separation in any way as compared to processing fresh ash.
The properties of the low-LOI fly ash recovered using the STET process for both freshly collected ash from the boiler and ash recovered from the landfill is summarized in Table 1. The results show that the product quality for ProAsh® produced from landfilled material is equivalent to product produced from fresh fly ash sources.
The properties of the ProAsh generated from the reclaimed landfill material were compared to that of ProAsh produced from fresh fly ash generated by the utility boilers from the same location. The processed reclaimed ash meets all the specifications of ASTM C618 and AASHTO M 250 standards. Tabel 2 summarizes the chemistry for samples from two of the sources showing the insignificant difference between the fresh and reclaimed material.
Strength development of a 20% substitution of the low-LOI fly ash in a mortar containing 600 lb/yd3 cementitious material (see Table 3) showed the ProAsh product derived from landfilled ash yielded mortars with strength comparable to mortars produced using ProAsh from fresh fly ash produced at the same location. The end product of the beneficiated reclaimed ash would support high-end uses in the concrete industry consistent with the highly valuable position ProAsh enjoys in the markets it currently serves.
The availability of low-cost natural gas in the United States greatly enhances the economics of drying processes, including the drying of wetted fly ash from landfills. Tabel 4 summarizes the fuel costs for operations in the United States for 15% şi 20% moisture contents. Typical inefficiencies of drying are included in the calculated values. Costs are based on the mass of material after drying. The incremental costs for drying fly ash for STET triboelectrostatic separation processing are relatively low.
Even with the addition of feed drying costs, the STET separation process offers a low-cost, industrially proven process for LOI reduction of landfilled fly ash. The STET process for reclaimed fly ash is one-third to one-half of the capital cost compared to combustion-based systems. The STET process for reclaimed fly ash also has significantly lower emissions to the environment compared to combustion or flotation-based systems. Because the only additional air emission source to the standard STET process installation is a natural gas-fired dryer, permitting it would be relatively simple.
| Feed sample to separator | LOI, % | ProAsh LOI, % | ProAsh fineness, % +325 ochiurilor de plasă |
ProAsh mass yield, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh A | 10.2 | 3.6 | 23 | 84 |
| Landfilled A | 11.1 | 3.6 | 20 | 80 |
| Fresh B | 5.3 | 2.0 | 13 | 86 |
| Landfilled B | 7.1 | 2.0 | 15 | 65 |
| Fresh C | 4.7 | 2.6 | 16 | 82 |
| Landfilled C | 5.7 | 2.5 | 23 | 72 |
| Landfilled D | 10.8 | 3.0 | 25 | 80 |
| Material source | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | Mgo | K2O | Na2O | SO3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh B | 51.60 | 24.70 | 9.9 | 2.22 | 0.85 | 2.19 | 0.28 | 0.09 |
| Landfilled B | 50.40 | 25.00 | 9.3 | 3.04 | 0.85 | 2.41 | 0.21 | 0.11 |
| Fresh C | 47.7 | 23.4 | 10.8 | 5.6 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.03 |
| Landfilled C | 48.5 | 26.5 | 11.5 | 1.8 | 0.86 | 2.39 | 1.18 | 0.02 |
| 7-day compressive strength, % of fresh ash control | 28-day compressive strength, % of fresh ash control | |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh B | 100 | 100 |
| Landfilled B | 107 | 113 |
| Fresh C | 100 | 100 |
| Landfilled C | 97 | 99 |
| Moisture content, % | Heat requirement KWhr/T wet basis | Drying cost/T dry basis (natural gas cost $3.45/mmBtu) |
| 15 | 165 | $ 2.28 |
| 20 | 217 | $ 3.19 |
In addition to the low-carbon product for use in concrete— brand-named ProAsh—the STET separation process also recovers otherwise wasted unburned carbon in the form of carbon-rich fly ash, marcă EcoTherm™. EcoTherm has significant fuel value and can easily be returned to the electric power plant using the STET EcoTherm Return system to reduce the coal use at the plant. When EcoTherm is burned in the utility boiler, the energy from combustion is converted to high-pressure/high-temperature steam and then to electricity at the same efficiency as coal, de obicei 35%. The conversion of the recovered thermal energy to electricity in the STET EcoTherm Return system is two to three times higher than that of the competitive technology where the energy is recovered as low-grade heat in the form of hot water, which is circulated to the boiler feed water system. EcoTherm is also used as a source of alumina in cement kilns, displacing the more expensive bauxite, which is usually transported long distances. Using the high-carbon EcoTherm ash either at a power plant or a cement kiln maximizes the energy recovery from the delivered coal, reduce necesitatea de a mea si combustibil suplimentare la facilităţile de transport.
STET's Talen Energie Brandon Shores, RALUK SMEPA. Morrow, CORNEL Belledune, RWEnpower Didcot, FED energie Burton vest, RWEnpower Aberthaw, and the Korea South-East Power fly ash plants all include EcoTherm Return systems.
STET’s separation process has been used commercially since 1995 for fly ash beneficiation and has generated over 20 milioane de tone de calitate cenuși zburătoare pentru beton de producţie. Controlled low-LOI ProAsh is currently produced with STET’s technology at 12 centrale electrice în Statele Unite ale Americii, Canada, Marea Britanie, Polonia, şi Republica Coreea. ProAshfly ash has been approved for use by more than 20 autorităţile de autostrada statului, precum și multe alte agenții de specificații. ProAsh has also been certified under the Canadian Standards Association and EN 450:2005 standardele de calitate în Europa. Instalațiile de prelucrare a cenușii care utilizează tehnologia STET sunt enumerate în tabelul 5.
After suitable scalping of large material, drying, and deagglomeration, fly ash recovered from utility plant landfills can be reduced in carbon content using the commercialized STET triboelectric belt separator. The quality of the fly ash product, ProAsh, using the STET system on reclaimed landfill material, is equivalent to ProAsh produced from fresh feed fly ash. The ProAsh product is very well-suited and proven in concrete production. The recovery and beneficiation of landfilled ash will provide a continuing supply of high-quality ash for concrete producers in spite of the reduced production of “fresh” ash as coal-fired utilities reduce generation. Suplimentar, power plants that need to remove ash from landfills to meet changing environmental regulations will be able to use the process to alter a waste product liability into a valuable raw material for concrete producers. The STET separation process with feed preprocessing equipment for drying and deagglomerating landfilled fly ash is an attractive option for ash beneficiation with significantly lower cost and lower emissions compared to other combustion- and flotation-based systems. ❖
1. American Coal Ash Coal Combustion Products and Use Statistics, http://www.acaausa.org/Publications/Production-Use-Reports.
2. ST Internal Report, Aug. 1995.
3. Li, T. X.; Schaefer, J. L.; Ban, H.; Neathery, J. K.; and Stencel, J. M., “Dry Beneficiation Processing of Combustion Fly Ash,” Proceedings of the DOE Conference on Unburned Carbon on Utility Fly Ash, Pittsburgh, PA, Poate 19-20, 1998.
4. Baltrus, J. P.; Diehl, J. R.; Soong, Y.; and Sands, W., “Triboelectrostatic Separation of Fly Ash and Charge Reversal,” Fuel, V. 81, 2002, PP. 757-762.
5. Cangialosi, F.; Notarnicola, M.; Liberti, L.; and Stencel, J., “The Role of Weathering on Fly Ash Charge Distribution during Triboelectrostatic Beneficiation,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, V. 164, 2009, PP. 683-688.
Lewis Baker is the European Technical Support Manager for ST Equipment & Tehnologie (STET) based in the United Kingdom
Abhishek Gupta is a Process Engineer based at the STET pilot plant and lab facility in Needham, MARIAN.
Stephen Gasiorowski is a Senior Research Scientist for ST Equipment & Tehnologie (STET) based in New Hampshire.
Frank Hrach is Vice President of Process Engineering based at the STET pilot plant and lab facility in Needham, MARIAN.
| Utility and power station | Locația | Începerea operațiunilor comerciale | Detalii despre facilitate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Energy—Roxboro Station | Carolina de Nord | Septembrie. 1997 | 2 separators |
| Talen Energy—Brandon Shores Station | Maryland | Apr. 1999 | 2 separators 35,000 ton storage dome Ecotherm Return 2008 |
| ScotAsh (Lafarge / Scottish Power Joint Venture)—Longannet Station | Scoţia, Regatul unit | Oct. 2002 | 1 separator |
| Jacksonville Electric Authority— St. John's River Power Park, fl | Florida | Poate 2003 | 2 separators Coal/petcoke blends Ammonia removal |
| South Mississippi Electric Power Authority R.D. Stația Morrow | Mississippi | Jan. 2005 | 1 separator Ecotherm return |
| Stația Belledune a companiei energetice New Brunswick | Noul Brunswick, Canada | Apr. 2005 | 1 separator Coal/petcoke blends Ecotherm return |
| Stația RWE npower Didcot | Anglia, U | Aug. 2005 | 1 separator Ecotherm return |
| Talen Energy Brunner Island Station | Pennsylvania | Dec. 2006 | 2 separators 40,000 tonă de stocare cupolă |
| Tampa Electric Co. Stația Big Bend | Florida | Apr. 2008 | 3 separators, trecere dublă 25,000 ton storage dome Ammonia removal |
| RWE npower Stația Aberthaw (Lafarge Ciment Marea Britanie) | Wales, Regatul unit | Septembrie. 2008 | 1 separator Ammonia removal Ecotherm return |
| Stația EDF Energy West Burton (Lafarge Ciment Marea Britanie, Cemex) | Anglia, Regatul unit | Oct. 2008 | 1 separator Ecotherm return |
| ZGP (Lafarge Ciment Polonia / Ciech Janikosoda JV) | Polonia | Mar. 2010 | 1 separato |
| Korea South-East Power Yeongheung Units 5&6 | Coreea de Sud | Septembrie. 2014 | 1 separator Ecotherm return |
| PGNiG Termika-Siekierki | Polonia | Programată 2016 | 1 separator Ecotherm return |
| To Be Announced | Polonia | Programată 2016 | 1 separator Ecotherm return |
